4.7 Article

Challenges to self-acceleration in modified gravity from gravitational waves and large-scale structure

期刊

PHYSICS LETTERS B
卷 765, 期 -, 页码 382-385

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.12.048

关键词

-

资金

  1. SNSF Advanced Postdoc.Mobility Fellowship [161058]
  2. STFC Consolidated Grant for Astronomy and Astrophysics at the University of Edinburgh
  3. FCT grant [SFRH/BD/85164/2012]
  4. BIS National E-infrastructure capital grant [ST/J005673/1]
  5. STFC [ST/H008586/1, ST/K00333X/1]
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000636/1, ST/J005673/1, ST/M00418X/1, ST/H008586/1, ST/M007065/1, ST/K00333X/1, ST/P000673/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. STFC [ST/L000636/1, ST/H008586/1, ST/M007065/1, ST/M00418X/1, ST/K00333X/1, ST/J005673/1, ST/P000673/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the advent of gravitational-wave astronomy marked by the aLIGO GW150914 and GW151226 observations, a measurement of the cosmological speed of gravity will likely soon be realised. We show that a confirmation of equality to the speed of light as indicated by indirect Galactic observations will have important consequences for a very large class of alternative explanations of the late-time accelerated expansion of our Universe. It will break the dark degeneracy of self-accelerated Horndeski scalar tensor theories in the large-scale structure that currently limits a rigorous discrimination between acceleration from modified gravity and from a cosmological constant or dark energy. Signatures of a self-acceleration must then manifest in the linear, unscreened cosmological structure. We describe the minimal modification required for self-acceleration with standard gravitational-wave speed and show that its maximum likelihood yields a 3 sigma poorer fit to cosmological observations compared to a cosmological constant. Hence, equality between the speeds challenges the concept of cosmic acceleration from a genuine scalar tensor modification of gravity. (C) 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据