4.8 Article

From Planck Data to Planck Era: Observational Tests of Holographic Cosmology

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 118, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.041301

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council (Consolidated Grant Exploring the Limits of the Standard Model and Beyond)
  2. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
  3. Government of Canada through the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
  4. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science
  5. Angelo Della Riccia foundation
  6. Leverhulme Trust
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000296/1, ST/P000711/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. STFC [ST/P000711/1, ST/L000296/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We test a class of holographic models for the very early Universe against cosmological observations and find that they are competitive to the standard cold dark matter model with a cosmological constant (Lambda CDM) of cosmology. These models are based on three-dimensional perturbative superrenormalizable quantum field theory (QFT), and, while they predict a different power spectrum from the standard power law used in Lambda CDM, they still provide an excellent fit to the data (within their regime of validity). By comparing the Bayesian evidence for the models, we find that Lambda CDM does a better job globally, while the holographic models provide a (marginally) better fit to the data without very low multipoles (i.e., l less than or similar to 30), where the QFT becomes nonperturbative. Observations can be used to exclude some QFT models, while we also find models satisfying all phenomenological constraints: The data rule out the dual theory being a Yang-Mills theory coupled to fermions only but allow for a Yang-Mills theory coupled to nonminimal scalars with quartic interactions. Lattice simulations of 3D QFTs can provide nonperturbative predictions for large-angle statistics of the cosmic microwave background and potentially explain its apparent anomalies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据