4.6 Article

Causal compatibility inequalities admitting quantum violations in the triangle structure

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
卷 98, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.022113

关键词

-

资金

  1. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
  2. Government of Canada through the Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
  3. Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It has long been recognized that certain quantum correlations are incompatible with a particular assumption about classical causal structure. Given a causal structure of unknown classicality, the presence of such correlations certifies the nonclassical nature of the causal structure in a device-independent fashion. In structures where all parties share a common resource, these nonclassical correlations are also known as nonlocal correlations. Any constraint satisfied by all correlations which are classically compatible with a given causal structure defines a causal compatibility criterion. Such criteria were recently derived for the triangle structure (E. Wolfe et al., arXiv:1609.00672) in the form of polynomial inequalities, begging the question of whether any of those inequalities admit violation by quantum correlations. Numerical investigation suggests that they do not, and we further conjecture that the set of correlations admitted by the classical triangle structure is equivalent to the set of correlations admitted by its quantum generalization whenever the three observable variables are binary. Our main contribution in this work, however, is the derivation of causal compatibility inequalities for the triangle structure which do admit quantum violation. This provides a robust-to-noise witness of quantum correlations in the triangle structure. We conclude by considering the possibility of quantum resources potentially qualitatively different from those known previously.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据