4.8 Article

Search for Invisible Decays of a Dark Photon Produced in e+e- Collisions at BABAR

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 119, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.131804

关键词

-

资金

  1. SLAC
  2. US Department of Energy
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada)
  5. Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique (France)
  6. Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et de Physique des Particules (France)
  7. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (Germany)
  8. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Germany)
  9. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (Italy)
  10. Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (The Netherlands)
  11. Research Council of Norway
  12. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
  13. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (Spain)
  14. Science and Technology Facilities Council (United Kingdom)
  15. Binational Science Foundation (U.S.-Israel)
  16. European Union
  17. A. P. Sloan Foundation (USA)
  18. STFC [ST/N000420/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  19. Division Of Physics
  20. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1404070] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We search for single-photon events in 53 fb(-1) of e(+)e(-) collision data collected with the BABAR detector at the PEP-II B-Factory. We look for events with a single high-energy photon and a large missing momentum and energy, consistent with production of a spin-1 particle A' through the process e(+)e(-) -> gamma A'; A' -> invisible. Such particles, referred to as dark photons, are motivated by theories applying a U(1) gauge symmetry to dark matter. We find no evidence for such processes and set 90% confidence level upper limits on the coupling strength of A' to e(+)e(-) in the mass range m(A') <= 8 GeV. In particular, our limits exclude the values of the A' coupling suggested by the dark-photon interpretation of the muon (g - 2)(mu) anomaly, as well as a broad range of parameters for the dark-sector models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据