4.8 Article

Gaussian Hypothesis Testing and Quantum Illumination

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 119, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.120501

关键词

-

资金

  1. SNSF
  2. Institute for Quantum Information and Matter (IQIM), a NSF Physics Frontiers Center (NSF) [PHY-1125565]
  3. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF-12500028]
  4. ARO grant for Research on Quantum Algorithms at the IQIM [W911NF-12-1-0521]
  5. ARC Discovery Early Career Researcher Award fellowship [DE160100821]
  6. NSF [CCF-1350397]
  7. Division Of Physics
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1125565] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantum hypothesis testing is one of the most basic tasks in quantum information theory and has fundamental links with quantum communication and estimation theory. In this paper, we establish a formula that characterizes the decay rate of the minimal type-II error probability in a quantum hypothesis test of two Gaussian states given a fixed constraint on the type-I error probability. This formula is a direct function of the mean vectors and covariance matrices of the quantum Gaussian states in question. We give an application to quantum illumination, which is the task of determining whether there is a low-reflectivity object embedded in a target region with a bright thermal-noise bath. For the asymmetric-error setting, we find that a quantum illumination transmitter can achieve an error probability exponent stronger than a coherent-state transmitter of the same mean photon number, and furthermore, that it requires far fewer trials to do so. This occurs when the background thermal noise is either low or bright, which means that a quantum advantage is even easier to witness than in the symmetric-error setting because it occurs for a larger range of parameters. Going forward from here, we expect our formula to have applications in settings well beyond those considered in this paper, especially to quantum communication tasks involving quantum Gaussian channels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据