4.6 Article

Towards a taxonomy of topology for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons: linking electronic and molecular structure

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 19, 期 41, 页码 28458-28469

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cp06048c

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [CBET-1142284, CBET-1706757]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trends linking the topological characteristics of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) to their electronic properties are reported. TD-DFT electronic spectra computations, using the 6-31G* basis set and B3LYP exchange correlation functional, were calculated for a series of PAH, allowing for the HOMO-LUMO gaps to be reported. Clar structures provide an avenue to link the physical structure and the aromaticity of the molecule; which, when extended by bond length and harmonic oscillator model of aromaticity analysis, provide powerful tools to understand the link between electronic and physical structure. These results lead to the conclusion that all PAH structures show a decrease in HOMO-LUMO gap as a function of size, but the rate of that decrease is directly related to the topology of the molecules. A PAH taxonomy was developed that categorizes PAH into categories with similar topological properties, which allows for modelling of changes in the HOMO-LUMO gap with PAH size. An atom-pair minimization algorithm was used to calculate the binding energy (BE) of homogeneous dimers of the studied PAH. The BE per carbon atom increases with the overall size of the structure to an asymptotic limit, but as with the HOMO-LUMO gap, topology plays a critical secondary factor. Previously published, experimentally determined optical band gaps (OBG) from Tauc/Davis-Mott analysis of extinction spectra in various laminar, non-premixed flames produced a correlation between the HOMO-LUMO gaps of high-symmetry, nearly circular D-2h symmetry molecules to molecular size. The work presented here provides a much more nuanced and predictive evaluation of how OBG depends on structure and size.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据