4.2 Article

More on Plagiarism in the Social Sciences

期刊

SOCIAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY
卷 99, 期 3, 页码 1075-1088

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12481

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research presents the results of a follow-up survey to journal editors more than a decade after Enders and Hoover (Journal of Economic Literature 42(3):487-93). The original survey asked editors about their definition of plagiarism and known cases. This work investigates what, if anything, has changed in regards to how journal editors react to suspected plagiarism and if the definition of plagiarism has changed. In addition to surveying editors of economics journals, we have surveyed many more editors, including political science, sociology, and others, to contrast differences that might exist. There is great variation within disciplines regarding the appropriate definition of plagiarism or punishments but fairly consistent agreement across disciplines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据