4.3 Article

Inflammation-related epigenetic risk and child and adolescent mental health: A prospective study from pregnancy to middle adolescence

期刊

DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 1145-1156

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0954579418000330

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK Medical Research Council
  2. Wellcome Trust [102215/2/13/2]
  3. University of Bristol
  4. BBSRC [BBI025751/1, BB/I025263/1]
  5. MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol [MC_UU_12013/2, MC_UU_12013/8]
  6. National Institute of Child and Human Development [R01HD068437]
  7. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/R005516/1, ES/N001273/1]
  8. ESRC/BBSRC [ES/N000382/1]
  9. BBSRC [BB/I025263/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. ESRC [ES/N001273/1, ES/R005516/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. MRC [G108/603, MC_UU_12013/8, MC_UU_12013/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 785 mother-child (50% male) pairs from a longitudinal epidemiological birth cohort, we investigated associations between inflammation-related epigenetic polygenic risk scores (i-ePGS), environmental exposures, cognitive function, and child and adolescent internalizing and externalizing problems. We examined prenatal and postnatal effects. For externalizing problems, one prenatal effect was found: i-ePGS at birth associated with higher externalizing problems (ages 7-15) indirectly through lower cognitive function (age 7). For internalizing problems, we identified two effects. For a prenatal effect, i-ePGS at birth associated with higher internalizing symptoms via continuity in i-ePGS at age 7. For a postnatal effect, higher postnatal adversity exposure (birth through age 7) associated with higher internalizing problems (ages 7-15) via higher i-ePGS (age 7). Hence, externalizing problems were related mainly to prenatal effects involving lower cognitive function, whereas internalizing problems appeared related to both prenatal and postnatal effects. The present study supports a link between i-ePGS and child and adolescent mental health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据