4.4 Article

Enhanced susceptibility to cortical spreading depression in two types of Na+,K+-ATPase 2 subunit-deficient mice as a model of familial hemiplegic migraine 2

期刊

CEPHALALGIA
卷 38, 期 9, 页码 1515-1524

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0333102417738249

关键词

Na+; K+-ATPase 2 subunit; cortical spreading depression; familial hemiplegic migraine 2; Atp1a2

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [26350981, 26461284, 15K06760, 16K08629, 22390182]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K08629, 26461284, 26350981, 15K06760] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Patients with familial hemiplegic migraine type 2 (FHM2) have a mutated ATP1A2 gene (encoding Na+,K+-ATPase 2 subunit) and show prolonged migraine aura. Cortical spreading depression (CSD), which involves mass depolarization of neurons and astrocytes that propagates slowly through the gray matter, is profoundly related to aura. Methods In two types of Atp1a2-defective heterozygous mice, Atp1a2(tm1Kwk) (C-KO) and Atp1a2(tm2Kwk) (N-KO), the sensitivity and responsiveness to CSD were examined under urethane anesthesia. Results In both cases, heterozygotes exhibited a low threshold for induction of CSD, faster propagation rate, slower recovery from DC deflection, and profound suppression of the electroencephalogram, compared to wild-type mice. A high dose of KCl elicited repeated CSDs for a longer period, with a tendency for a greater frequency of CSD occurrence in heterozygotes. The difference of every endpoint was slightly greater in N-KO than C-KO. Change of regional cerebral blood flow in response to CSD showed no significant difference. Conclusion Heterozygotes of Atp1a2-defective mice simulating FHM2 demonstrated high susceptibility to CSD rather than cortical vasoreactivity, and these effects may differ depending upon the knockout strategy for the gene disruption. These results suggest that patients with FHM2 may exhibit high susceptibility to CSD, resulting in migraine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据