4.6 Article

Probing the degradation and homogeneity of embedded perovskite semiconducting layers in photovoltaic devices by Raman spectroscopy

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 19, 期 7, 页码 5246-5253

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6cp05123e

关键词

-

资金

  1. Welsh Assembly Government [EP/M025020/1]
  2. European Social Fund through the Welsh Government
  3. Renishaw plc
  4. Supersolar [EP/J017361/1]
  5. EPSRC Selfassembling Perovskite Absorbers - Cells Engineered into Modules (SPACE-Modules) [EP/M015252/1]
  6. EPSRC
  7. TSB
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M015254/2, EP/M015254/1, EP/N020863/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. EPSRC [EP/M015254/1, EP/N020863/1, EP/M015254/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The key challenges for perovskite solar cells include their poor stability and film homogeneity. Studying the degradation and homogeneity of perovskite layers within device structures can be challenging but critical to the understanding of stability and effect of processing in real life conditions. We show that Raman spectroscopy (RS) is a unique and powerful method (simple and fast) to probe the degradation of the perovskite film within the device structure and image perovskite formation. We demonstrate that RS can be used to directly probe chemical (PbI2) and physical (dihydrated phase) degradation of a perovskite film, and estimate the relative amount of the degradation species formed, mapping its distribution with similar to 1 mu m spatial resolution. This has been applied to mapping a large area perovskite module to characterise the efficacy of PbI2 to perovskite conversion. We also use RS to study the degradation species and kinetics under diverse accelerated degradation conditions (temperature and humidity) in situ. These capabilities are difficult to achieve with other methods, presenting RS as an important tool to gain understanding of the degradation and effect of processing on perovskite-based photovoltaic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据