4.6 Article

Mechanochemically induced sulfur doping in ZnO via oxygen vacancy formation

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 19, 期 21, 页码 13838-13845

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cp01489a

关键词

-

资金

  1. JSPS International Training Program (ITP)
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [JP15KK0203]
  3. Cluster of Excellence EAM
  4. FPS
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15KK0203] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surface defects of ZnO nanoparticles were induced via mechanical stressing using a Turbula shaker mixer and a planetary ball mill, and the possibilities for surface modification and functionalization of the ZnO nanoparticles were exemplified by sulfur doping of activated ZnO. Raman spectroscopy reveals that the formation of oxygen vacancies (V-O) does not only occur under high stressing conditions in a planetary ball mill but even upon rather 'mild stressing' in the shaker mixer. The temporal evolution of the vacancy concentration in ZnO stressed under different conditions can be described by a model that accounts for stress number and vacancy diffusion with diffusion coefficients of V-O of 3.7 x 10(-21) m(2) s(-1) and 2.4 x 10(-20) m(2) s(-1) for stressing in the shaker and the planetary ball mill, respectively. The thickness of the V-O layer was estimated to be about 1 nm. Thiourea was mixed with defective ZnO particles, and then heated at various temperatures for sulfur-doping. A linear relationship between the amount of induced V-O and the level of sulfur doping was found. Remarkably, mechanical activation is indispensable in order to control the level of sulfur doping quantitatively. High-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF STEM) observations with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis clearly revealed that the doped sulfur atoms are concentrated at the particle surface. Thus, ZnO (core)/ZnS (shell) structures are obtained easily via mechanochemical activation and subsequent thermal treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据