4.3 Article

Genomic characterisation of an international Pseudomonas aeruginosa reference panel indicates that the two major groups draw upon distinct mobile gene pools

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
卷 365, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsle/fny120

关键词

Pseudomonas aeruginosa; comparative genomics; antimicrobial resistance; genomic islands

资金

  1. Cystic Fibrosis Canada
  2. Genome Canada
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation fellowship [P300PA 164673]
  4. Societe Academique Vaudoise
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgmeinschaft [SFB900]
  6. Action Medical Research [GN2444]
  7. Medical Research Foundation [MRF-091-0006-RG-FOTHE]
  8. UK Cystic Fibrosis Trust [RS34]
  9. MRC [MR/L011263/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P300PA_164673] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  11. Medical Research Foundation [MRF-091-0006-RG-FOTHE] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an important opportunistic pathogen, especially in the context of infections of cystic fibrosis (CF). In order to facilitate coordinated study of this pathogen, an international reference panel of P. aeruginosa isolates was assembled. Here we report the genome sequencing and analysis of 33 of these isolates and 7 reference genomes to further characterise this panel. Core genome single nucleotide variant phylogeny demonstrated that the panel strains are widely distributed amongst the P. aeruginosa population. Common loss-of-function mutations reported as adaptive during CF (such as in mucA and mexA) were identified amongst isolates from chronic respiratory infections. From the 40 strains analysed, 37 unique resistomes were predicted, based on the Resistance Gene Identifier method using the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Notably, hierarchical clustering and phylogenetic reconstructions based on the presence/absence of genomic islands (GIs), prophages and other regions of genome plasticity (RGPs) supported the subdivision of P. aeruginosa into two main groups. This is the largest, most diverse analysis of GIs and associated RGPs to date, and the results suggest that, at least at the largest Glade grouping level (group 1 vs group 2), each group may be drawing upon distinct mobile gene pools.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据