4.7 Article

CO2 and energy efficiency car standards in the EU in the context of a decarbonisation strategy: A model-based policy assessment

期刊

ENERGY POLICY
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 22-34

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.024

关键词

Car CO2 standards; Car energy efficiency standards; Passenger transport; Alternative car technologies; Transport and energy policy; Transport and energy modelling

资金

  1. European Commission's Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (DG MOVE) under the project Study on Clean Transport Systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The European Union introduced CO2 emission standards on cars as an obligation to manufacturers to reduce carbon footprint of cars in EU transportation. The car industry is already marketing low carbon emitting technologies to adjust to the 95 gCO(2)/km target set for 2020. An alternative policy option is setting energy efficiency standards, measured as energy consumption per kilometre. A policy based on a long-term commitment on continuously decreasing standards and the choice of the focus between CO2 or energy efficiency will strongly influence car technology choice. The aim of this paper is to assess these candidate policies for the EU in terms of effectiveness, costs and emission implications until 2050 on the basis of scenarios quantified using the PRIMES-TREMOVE energy economic transport model. The scenarios assume various configurations of the standards and the assessment draws on comparisons to a Reference scenario which does not strengthen standards after 2025. The analysis shows that restructuring the EU car fleet towards significant reductions of energy consumption and CO2 emissions is affordable provided that preconditions are met regarding technology progress and development of refuelling/recharging infrastructure. CO2 standards allow a diversified use of technologies, while efficiency standards are more risky favouring a single technology. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据