4.3 Article

Energy dissipation and antioxidant enzyme system protect photosystem II of sweet sorghum under drought stress

期刊

PHOTOSYNTHETICA
卷 56, 期 3, 页码 861-872

出版社

ACAD SCIENCES CZECH REPUBLIC, INST EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
DOI: 10.1007/s11099-017-0741-0

关键词

antioxidant enzymes; chlorophyll fluorescence; environmental stress; sorghum bicolor; water

资金

  1. NSFC (National Natural Science Research Foundation of China) [31300205]
  2. Natural Science Research Foundation of Shandong [ZR2013CQ009]
  3. Science and Technology Development Projects of Shandong Province [2014GNC113005]
  4. Opening Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, China [2015KF01]
  5. Opening Foundation of Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Ecology and Physiology
  6. Program for Scientific research innovation team in colleges and universities of Shandong Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of drought stress on energy dissipation and antioxidant enzyme system in two sweet sorghum inbred lines (M-81E and Roma) was investigated. Results showed that the germination indicator increased more in M-81E than that in Roma under rehydration. Under drought stress, both the maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII (F-v/F-m) and oxidoreductive activity (Delta I/I-0) of Roma decreased more than those in M-81E. Relative to Fv/Fm, the Delta I/I0 decreased markedly, which indicated that PSI was more sensitive to drought stress than PSII. Increases in the reduction state of Q(A) (1-q(p)), nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) and minimal fluorescence yield of the dark-adapted state (F-0) were greater in Roma than those in M-81E; meanwhile, the H2O2 content was lower in M-81E than that in Roma. Our results suggested that the photoinhibition might be related to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The antioxidant enzyme system and energy dissipation of M-81E could respectively increase drought tolerance by eliminating ROS and excess energy more efficiently than that of Roma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据