4.1 Article

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Lottery-Based Financial Incentives to Increase Physical Activity Among Overweight and Obese Adults

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION
卷 32, 期 7, 页码 1568-1575

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0890117118758932

关键词

behavioral economics; financial incentives; wellness incentives; lottery incentives; physical activity; workplace wellness program

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [RC4 AG039114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of lottery-based financial incentives in increasing physical activity. Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Setting: University of Pennsylvania Employees. Participants: A total of 209 adults with body mass index >= 27. Interventions: All participants used smartphones to track activity, were given a goal of 7000 steps per day, and received daily feedback on performance for 26 weeks. Participants randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 intervention arms received a financial incentive for 13 weeks and then were followed for 13 weeks without incentives. Daily lottery incentives were designed as a higher frequency, smaller reward (1 in 4 chance of winning $5), jackpot (1 in 400 chance of winning $500), or combined lottery (18% chance of $5 and 1% chance of $50). Measures: Mean proportion of participant days step goals were achieved. Analysis: Multivariate regression. Results: During the intervention, the unadjusted mean proportion of participant days that goal was achieved was 0.26 in the control arm, 0.32 in the higher frequency, smaller reward lottery arm, 0.29 in the jackpot arm, and 0.38 in the combined lottery arm. In adjusted models, only the combined lottery arm was significantly greater than control (P = .01). The jackpot arm had a significant decline of 0.13 (P < .001) compared to control. There were no significant differences during follow-up. Conclusions: Combined lottery incentives were most effective in increasing physical activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据