3.8 Article

Efficacy of Switching From Teriparatide to Bisphosphonate or Denosumab: A Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Trial

期刊

JBMR PLUS
卷 2, 期 5, 页码 289-294

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm4.10054

关键词

OSTEOPOROSIS; TERIPARATIDE; BISPHOSPHONATE; DENOSUMAB; BONE MINERAL DENSITY; SEQUENTIAL TREATMENT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is no consensus onan optimal treatment after daily teriparatide (TPTD). We performed a prospective, randomized, open-label, 12-month trial to investigate the efficacy of follow-up treatment after daily TPTD treatment for Japanese patients. Three-hundred patients were enrolled in this study. Patients received oral bisphosphonate (BP) including alendronate (ALN; 35mg/week) and minodoronate (MINO; 50mg/month), or subcutaneous denosumab (60mg/6 month). The primary efficacy measure was bonemineral density (BMD) responses in the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN). Lumbar spine BMD increased by 1.3 perpendicular to 5.1% in the ALN subgroups, 0.5 perpendicular to 4.6% in the MINO subgroups, and 4.3 perpendicular to 3.5% in the denosumab subgroups. Femoral neck BMD increased by 0.7 perpendicular to 4.6% in the ALN subgroups, 0.2 perpendicular to 4.6% in the MINO subgroups, and 1.4 perpendicular to 3.4% in the denosumab subgroups. Lumbar spine BMD increases were significantly greater in the denosumab subgroup than the BP subgroups. There were no significant differences in FN BMD increases among the three subgroups. Lumbar spine BMD increases were significantly greater in the denosumab subgroup than the BP subgroups, whereas FN BMD increases were not significant. Denosumab treatment was more effective in increasing BMD and therefore has the potential benefit of fracture prevention. Further research is warranted to determine the optimal treatment after daily TPTD. (C) 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据