4.6 Article

A-type Stars, the Destroyers of Worlds: The Lives and Deaths of Jupiters in Evolving Stellar Binaries

期刊

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
卷 156, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad6e5

关键词

binaries: general; planets and satellites: dynamical evolution and stability; stars: evolution; stars: kinematics and dynamics

资金

  1. Sloan foundation
  2. NSF [AST-1739160]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hot Jupiters (HJs), gas giant planets orbiting their host stars with periods on the order of days, commonly occur in the Galaxy, including relatively massive (1.6-2.4 M-circle dot, i.e., A-type main-sequence stars) and evolved stars. The majority of A-type main-sequence stars have stellar binary companions, that can strongly affect the dynamical evolution of planets around either star. In this work, we investigate the effects of gravitational perturbations by a far away stellar companion on the orbital evolution of gas giant planets orbiting A-type stars, the so-called Eccentric Kozai-Lidov mechanism, including the effects of general relativity, post-main-sequence stellar evolution, and tides. We find that only 0.15% of A-type stars will host HJs during their main-sequence lifetimes. However, we also find a new class of planets, Temporary Hot Jupiters (THJs), that form during the post-main-sequence lifetime of about 3.7% of former A-type main-sequence stars. These THJs orbit on periods of tens to a hundred days and only exist for a few 100,000 years before they are engulfed, but they reach similar temperatures as classical HJs due to the increased stellar luminosities. THJs' spin-orbit angles will mostly be misaligned. THJ effects on the host stars' evolution could also be observable for longer than a few 100,000 years. Overall, we find that approximately 70% of all gas giant planets orbiting A-type stars will eventually be destroyed or engulfed by their star, about 25% during the main-sequence lifetime, about 45% during post-main-sequence evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据