4.6 Review

Coevolution between transposable elements and recombination

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0458

关键词

transposable elements; recombination hotspots; ectopic recombination; heterochromatin

类别

资金

  1. Faculty of Arts and Science, University of Toronto
  2. NSERC CGS-M grant
  3. NSERC
  4. Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Population Genomics
  5. EWR Steacie Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the most striking patterns of genome structure is the tight, typically negative, association between transposable elements (TEs) and meiotic recombination rates. While this is a highly recurring feature of eukaryotic genomes, the mechanisms driving correlations between TEs and recombination remain poorly understood, and distinguishing cause versus effect is challenging. Here, we review the evidence for a relation between TEs and recombination, and discuss the underlying evolutionary forces. Evidence to date suggests that overall TE densities correlate negatively with recombination, but the strength of this correlation varies across element types, and the pattern can be reversed. Results suggest that heterogeneity in the strength of selection against ectopic recombination and gene disruption can drive TE accumulation in regions of low recombination, but there is also strong evidence that the regulation of TEs can influence local recombination rates. We hypothesize that TE insertion polymorphism may be important in driving within-species variation in recombination rates in surrounding genomic regions. Furthermore, the interaction between TEs and recombination may create positive feedback, whereby TE accumulation in non-recombining regions contributes to the spread of recombination suppression. Further investigation of the coevolution between recombination and TEs has important implications for our understanding of the evolution of recombination rates and genome structure. This article is part of the themed issue 'Evolutionary causes and consequences of recombination rate variation in sexual organisms'.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据