4.6 Article

Time-course and mechanisms of homeostatic plasticity in layers 2/3 and 5 of the barrel cortex

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0150

关键词

synapse; LTP; experience-dependent; LTD; synaptic scaling; sensory cortex

类别

资金

  1. MRC [MR/N003896/1]
  2. Physiological Society
  3. BBSRC [BB/J018422/1]
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J018422/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/N003896/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. BBSRC [BB/J018422/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. MRC [MR/N003896/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have shown that ocular dominance plasticity in layer 2/3 of the visual cortex exhibits a form of homeostatic plasticity that is related to synaptic scaling and depends on TNF alpha. In this study, we tested whether a similar form of plasticity was present in layer 2/3 of the barrel cortex and, therefore, whether the mechanism was likely to be a general property of cortical neurons. We found that whisker deprivation could induce homeostatic plasticity in layer 2/3 of barrel cortex, but not in a mouse strain lacking synaptic scaling. The time-course of homeostatic plasticity in layer 2/3 was similar to that of L5 regular spiking (RS) neurons (L5RS), but slower than that of L5 intrinsic bursting (IB) neurons (L5IB). In layer 5, the strength of evoked whisker responses and ex vivo miniature excitatory post-synaptic currents (mEPSCs) amplitudes showed an identical time-course for homeostatic plasticity, implying that plasticity at excitatory synapses contacting layer 5 neurons is sufficient to explain the changes in evoked responses. Spontaneous firing rate also showed homeostatic behaviour for L5IB cells, but was absent for L5RS cells over the time-course studied. Spontaneous firing rate homeostasis was found to be independent of evoked response homeostasis suggesting that the two depend on different mechanisms. This article is part of the themed issue 'Integrating Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity'.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据