4.6 Review

Chloroplast thioredoxin systems: prospects for improving photosynthesis

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0474

关键词

thioredoxin reductase; redox regulation; light reactions; Calvin-Benson cycle; NTRC; FTR

类别

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [276392, 271832]
  2. Doctoral Programme in Molecular Life Sciences in the University of Turku Graduate School
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [276392, 276392] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thioredoxins (TRXs) are protein oxidoreductases that control the structure and function of cellular proteins by cleavage of a disulphide bond between the side chains of two cysteine residues. Oxidized thioredoxins are reactivated by thioredoxin reductases (TR) and a TR-dependent reduction of TRXs is called a thioredoxin system. Thiol-based redox regulation is an especially important mechanism to control chloroplast proteins involved in biogenesis, in regulation of light harvesting and distribution of light energy between photosystems, in photosynthetic carbon fixation and other biosynthetic pathways, and in stress responses of plants. Of the two plant plastid thioredoxin systems, the ferredoxin-dependent system relays reducing equivalents from photosystem I via ferredoxin and ferredoxin-thioredoxin reductase (FTR) to chloroplast proteins, while NADPH-dependent thioredoxin reductase (NTRC) forms a complete thioredoxin system including both reductase and thioredoxin domains in a single polypeptide. Chloroplast thioredoxins transmit environmental light signals to biochemical reactions, which allows fine tuning of photosynthetic processes in response to changing environmental conditions. In this paper we focus on the recent reports on specificity and networking of chloroplast thioredoxin systems and evaluate the prospect of improving photosynthetic performance by modifying the activity of thiol regulators in plants. This article is part of the themed issue 'Enhancing photosynthesis in crop plants: targets for improvement'.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据