3.8 Article

Nutrient recovery from anaerobic sludge by membrane filtration: pilot tests at a 2.5 MWe biogas plant

出版社

ISLAMIC AZAD UNIV, ISFAHAN-KHORASGAN BRANCH
DOI: 10.1007/s40093-018-0218-6

关键词

Anaerobic digestion; Nutrient recovery; Ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis treatment; Total conditioning process; Fertiliser

资金

  1. German Federal Environmental Foundation (Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt) [AZ 31276]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Membrane filtration is recently applied to recover nutrients and dischargeable water from anaerobic sludge. The purpose of this study is to quantify nutrient separation, membrane performance, and process stability and to increase the economical applicability of the process by energetic optimisation. Methods At the site of a 2.5 MWe agricultural biogas plant, a membrane pilot plant was operated over a period of 7 months. It consisted of a screw press separator, a decanter centrifuge, an ultrafiltration unit, and a three-stage reverse osmosis unit. Mass and nutrient balances were generated by sampling and analysing every process stream. Process performance was analysed by monitoring separation efficiencies, membrane flux, cleaning intervals, and energy demand. Results Solid/liquid separation resulted in separation efficiencies of 70% for total solids and 80% for phosphorus. The solid fraction contained high concentrations of organics and particle-ligated nutrients (20% TS, 8 kg t(-1) N-total, 5 . 5 kg t(-1) P2O5). The retentate of the reverse osmosis had high concentrations of dissolved ammonia and potassium (4 kg(-1) NH4-N and 10 kg(-1) K2O). 38% of the sludge volume was recovered as clean water. Conclusion The membrane pilot plant successfully produced a solid N/P-fertiliser, a liquid N/K-fertiliser and clean water. The results contribute to a sound understanding and growing database for future adaption of the process chain. Hydrodynamic optimisation within the pilot plant reduced the energy demand of the ultrafiltration step by 50%, which considerably contributes to the economy of the process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据