4.1 Article

Plasma paraoxonase, oxidative status level, and their relationship with asthma control test in children with asthma

期刊

ALLERGOLOGIA ET IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA
卷 43, 期 4, 页码 346-352

出版社

ELSEVIER ESPANA SLU
DOI: 10.1016/j.aller.2014.05.009

关键词

Asthma control; Paraoxonase; Oxidant stress; Children; Biomarker

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Assessment of asthma with a control test has been suggested as a relevant approach in recent years. However, no biomarker of systemic inflammation has been included in the assessment of asthma control. Objective: To evaluate plasma paraoxonase (PON1), total oxidant status (TOS), and total antioxidant status (TAS) levels in children with asthma according to the disease control, and the performance in the identification of uncontrolled patients. Methods: Stable asthmatic children (n=85) and healthy controls (n=55) were recruited for this study. Blood samples were collected for plasma PON1, TOS, and TAS measurements. Any contributing factors that may affect plasma PON1, TAS, and TOS levels were excluded from both groups. The diagnostic potential of these measures was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Comparing the asthmatic children with the control group, plasma TAS and TOS levels were significantly higher (TAS; 6.9 +/- 2.1, 1.05 +/- 0.32, P<0.001, and TOS; 12.5 +/- 3.4, 5.5 +/- 3.8, P<0.001, respectively) and PON1 level was significantly lower (156.5 +/- 55, 298.6 +/- 87.6, respectively, P<0.001) in the asthmatic group than controls. In ROC analysis, PON1 presented an AUC 0.679 and TOS presented an AUC 0.645 for the identification of uncontrolled asthma, respectively. Asthma Control Test (ACT) presented an AUC of 0.972 for the identification of uncontrolled asthma. Conclusion: PON1 and TOS levels may be systemic markers of uncontrolled asthma in children. Combined use of these two biomarkers with asthma control test may identify patients with uncontrolled asthma in children. (C) 2014 SEICAP. Published by Elsevier Espatia, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据