4.7 Review

Resveratrol supplementation and plasma adipokines concentrations? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

期刊

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 394-405

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.01.012

关键词

Resveratrol; Adipokines; Adiponectin; Leptin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The results of human clinical trials have revealed that the effects of resveratrol on adipokines are inconsistent. Our objective was to elucidate the role of resveratrol supplementation on adipokines through a systematic review and a meta-analysis of available randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs).(1) The search included PubMed-MEDLINE, SCOPUS and ISI web of sciences database till up to 6th November 2016. Weight mean differences (WMD)(2) were calculated for net changes in adipokines using fixed effects or random-effects models; meta-regression analysis and publication bias were conducted in accordance with standard methods. Nine RCTs with 11 treatment arms were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of data from 10 treatment arms showed a significant change in plasma adiponectin concentrations following resveratrol supplementation (WMD: 1.10 mu/ml, 95%Cl: 0.88, 1.33, p <0.001); Q= 11.43,1(2) =21.29%, p = 0.247). There was a significant greater adiponectin-reducing effect in trials with higher than or equal to 100 mg/day (WMD: 1.11 mu/ml, 95%CI: 0.88, 1.34, p < 0.001), versus those with less than 100 mg/day dosage (WMD: 0.84 mu/ml, 95%Cl: 0.62, 2.31,p = 0.260). Meta-analysis of data from 5 treatment arms did not find any significant change in plasma leptin concentrations following resveratrol supplementation (WMD: 3.77 ng/ml, 95% CI: 2.28, 9.83, p= 0.222; Q= 8.00,1(2) = 50.01%). Resveratrol significantly improves adiponectin but does not affect leptin concentrations. Additional studies are required to further evaluate the potential benefits of resveratrol on adipokines in humans. 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据