4.5 Review

Model-Based Methods in the Biopharmaceutical Process Lifecycle

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 34, 期 12, 页码 2596-2613

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-017-2308-y

关键词

bioprocess; data mining; modelling; monitoring; optimization

资金

  1. Austrian research funding association (FFG) under the scope of the COMET program within the research project Industrial Methods for Process Analytical Chemistry - From Measurement Technologies to Information Systems (imPACts) [843546]
  2. Christian Doppler Forschungsgesellschaft [171]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Model-based methods are increasingly used in all areas of biopharmaceutical process technology. They can be applied in the field of experimental design, process characterization, process design, monitoring and control. Benefits of these methods are lower experimental effort, process transparency, clear rationality behind decisions and increased process robustness. The possibility of applying methods adopted from different scientific domains accelerates this trend further. In addition, model-based methods can help to implement regulatory requirements as suggested by recent Quality by Design and validation initiatives. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the state of the art of model-based methods, their applications, further challenges and possible solutions in the biopharmaceutical process life cycle. Today, despite these advantages, the potential of model-based methods is still not fully exhausted in bioprocess technology. This is due to a lack of (i) acceptance of the users, (ii) user-friendly tools provided by existing methods, (iii) implementation in existing process control systems and (iv) clear workflows to set up specific process models. We propose that model-based methods be applied throughout the lifecycle of a biopharmaceutical process, starting with the set-up of a process model, which is used for monitoring and control of process parameters, and ending with continuous and iterative process improvement via data mining techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据