4.7 Article

Reducing copper use in the environment: the use of larixol and larixyl acetate to treat downy mildew caused by Plasmopara viticola in viticulture

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 74, 期 2, 页码 477-488

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.4733

关键词

Larix decidua; botanical plant protection product; fungicide; Larixyne

资金

  1. EC, ProLarix [613600]
  2. University of Surrey

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDPlant extracts might provide sustainable alternatives to copper fungicides, which are still widely used despite their unfavourable ecotoxicological profile. Larch bark extract and its constituents, larixyl acetate and larixol, have been shown to be effective against grapevine downy mildew (Plasmopara viticola) under semi-controlled conditions. The aim of this study was to reduce the gap between innovation and the registration of a marketable product, namely to develop scalable extraction processes and to evaluate and optimise the performance of larch extracts under different conditions. RESULTSToxicologically and technically acceptable solvents like ethanol were used to extract the active compounds larixyl acetate and larixol from bark in sufficient amounts and their combined concentration could be increased by up to 39% by purification steps. The combined concentration of larixyl acetate and larixol from larch turpentine could be increased by up to 66%. The Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC100) against P. viticolain vitro (6-23 mu g mL(-1)) and the Effective Concentration (EC50) in planta under semi-controlled conditions (0.2-0.4 mg mL(-1)) were promising compared with other plant extracts. In vineyards, efficacies of larch extracts reached up to 68% in a stand-alone strategy and 84% in low-copper strategies. CONCLUSIONLarch extracts represent valid candidates for copper reduction in organic vineyards, and their development into a sustainable plant protection product might be feasible. (c) 2017 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据