4.7 Article

Development of a mechanical sexing system to improve the efficacy of an area-wide sterile insect release programme to control American serpentine leafminer (Diptera: Agromyzidae) in Canadian ornamental greenhouses

期刊

PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
卷 73, 期 5, 页码 830-837

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1002/ps.4494

关键词

Liriomyza trifolii; sterile insect technique; greenhouse pest control; pupal sexual dimorphism

资金

  1. CanadianAgriculturalAdaptation Programme (CAAP)
  2. National Science and Engineering Research Council through a NSERC Industrial Postgraduate Scholarship I - Canada Growers Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: American serpentine leafminer (ASL), Liriomyza trifolii (Burgess), is a significant pest of greenhouse ornamental crops, and females damage leaf tissue with their ovipositor during feeding and oviposition. The sterile insect technique has been advocated as a non-chemical alternative to currently available control methods. In area-wide sterile insect release programmes, males act as true vectors of sterility. Females should be eliminated from a cohort of pupae prior to irradiation to maximise production economics and sterility spread. The aim of this research was to develop a mechanical sexing system based on pupal size to reduce the proportion of ASL females. RESULTS: Cumulative frequency distributions were used to examine significant differences in male and female pupal length and dorsal and lateral width distributions. Optimum size cut-off points based on the largest differences in distribution curves were used to determine the dimensions of three different sieve designs. Sieve pores measuring 1.543mm by 0.765mm excluded 76% of female pupae and doubled the proportion of males in the throughput sample. CONCLUSION: Pupal sexual dimorphisms identified in this research can be used to design a sieve to aid in reducing the proportion of females prior to irradiation, thus improving the efficacy of an area-wide sterile insect release programme. (C) 2016 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据