4.5 Article

Microtextural Inheritance on Quartz Sand Grains from Pleistocene Periglacial Environments of the Mazovian Lowland, Central Poland

期刊

PERMAFROST AND PERIGLACIAL PROCESSES
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 741-756

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ppp.1943

关键词

quartz grains; microtextures; scanning electron microscopy; aeolian sands; periglacial environment; sediment recycling

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland [N N307 2731 33, 1241/2, 1686/2, 1726/3, 1761/3, 1797/3]
  2. Mazovian Stipend
  3. European Regional Development Fund within the Innovation Economy Operational Program [POIG.02.02.00-00-025/09/]
  4. SIA SunGIS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sand grains from Quaternary glacial, aeolian and fluvial deposits in the Mazovian Lowland, central Poland, were examined to characterize the effects of different Quaternary processes on sand-grain surfaces that experienced repeated cycles of intense polar-desert-like conditions during the Middle and Late Pleistocene. A cold, dry and windy periglacial environment prevailed here at least twice between the Saalian (Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 6) and Holocene (MIS 1) stages. Because the surface characteristics of quartz sand grains can provide important palaeoenvironmental information, we examined grains extracted from sediment samples in different landforms to determine their surficial features from scanning electron microscope images. The grain surfaces were dominated by microtextures characteristic of aeolian-induced grain transformation, indicated by a high percentage of well-rounded, low-relief-worn grains with dish-shaped depressions, bulbous edges and upturned plates. Although remnants of previous sedimentary cycles were occasionally observed, aeolian effects were dominant even in glacial and fluvial settings. Quartz microtextures indicated that none of the examined grains represented their original setting, but rather suggested remobilisation under periglacial conditions. Copyright (c) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据