Volatile organic compounds at a rural site in Beijing: influence of temporary emission control and wintertime heating

While residential coal/biomass burning might be a major and underappreciated emission source for PM2.5, especially during winter, it is not well constrained whether burning solid fuels contributes substantially to ambient volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which are precursors to secondary organic aerosols (SOAs) that typically have a higher contribution to particulate matter during winter haze events. In this study, ambient air samples were collected in 2014 from 25 October to 31 December at a rural site on the campus of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS) in northeastern Beijing for the analysis of VOCs. Since temporary intervention measures were implemented on 3-12 November to improve the air quality for the Asian-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit held on 5-11 November in Beijing, and wintertime central heating started on 15 November in Beijing after the APEC summit, this sample collection period provided a good opportunity to study the influence of temporary control measures and wintertime heating on ambient VOCs. As a result of the temporary intervention measures implemented during 3-12 November (period II), the total mixing ratios of non-methane hydrocarbons averaged 11.25 ppb, approximately 50 % lower than the values of 23.41 ppb in period I (25 October-2 November) and 21.71 ppb in period III (13 November-31 December). The ozone and SOA formation potentials decreased by similar to 50 % and similar to 70 %, respectively, during period II relative to period I, with the larger decrease in SOA formation potentials attributed to more effective control over aromatic hydrocarbons mainly from solvent use. Back trajectory analysis revealed that the average mixing ratios of VOCs in southerly air masses were 2.3, 2.3 and 2.9 times those in northerly air masses during periods I, II and III, respectively; all VOC episodes occurred under the influence of southerly winds, suggesting much stronger emissions in the southern urbanized regions than in the northern rural areas. Based on a positive matrix factorization (PMF) receptor model, the altered contributions from traffic emissions and solvent use could explain 47.9 % and 37.6 % of the reduction in ambient VOCs, respectively, during period II relative to period I, indicating that the temporary control measures on vehicle emissions and solvent use were effective at lowering the ambient levels of VOCs. Coal/biomass burning, gasoline exhaust and industrial emissions were among the major sources, and they altogether contributed 60.3 %, 78.6 % and 78.7 % of the VOCs during periods I, II and III, respectively. Coal/biomass burning, mostly residential coal burning, became the dominant source, accounting for 45.1 % of the VOCs during the wintertime heating period, with a specifically lower average contribution percentage in southerly air masses (38.2 %) than in northerly air masses (48.8 %). The results suggest that emission control in the industry and traffic sectors is more effective in lowering ambient reactive VOCs in non-heating seasons; however, during the winter heating season reducing emissions from residential burning of solid fuels would be of greater importance and would have health co-benefits from lowering both indoor and outdoor air pollution.