4.0 Review

Phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia

期刊

PEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 59, 期 9, 页码 959-966

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ped.13332

关键词

bilirubin photoisomer; bronze baby syndrome; green light; human serum albumin; subclinical carcinogenic risk

资金

  1. JSPA KAKENHI [16K10092, 16K10093, 17K10179]
  2. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) [17824886]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K10093] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Approximately 60years ago in England, phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia was used in clinical practice. It was introduced in Japan approximately 50years ago. At that time, the mechanism underlying the serum bilirubin concentration decrease by phototherapy was still unknown. The mechanism was identified by chemists, biochemists, and pediatricians. Clarification started with the report that unconjugated bilirubin was excreted into bile after photoirradiation in Gunn rats. After confirmation of the molecular structure of bilirubin on X-ray analysis, the mechanism for bile excretion of unconjugated bilirubin was verified based on geometric configurational photoisomers in the Gunn rat. Finally, the reaction and excretion of structural bilirubin photoisomers was proved to be the main mechanism for the decrease in serum bilirubin during phototherapy for neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, which differs from the mechanism in the Gunn rat. The most effective and safest light source and the optimal method to evaluate phototherapy, however, remain unknown. Moreover, as for bronze baby syndrome, which is a well-known adverse reaction to phototherapy, the etiology is unclear. Hence, we review phototherapy for hyperbilirubinemia including a fundamental understanding of the bilirubin photochemical reactions, and discuss the subclinical carcinogenic risk of phototherapy and the increased mortality rate of extremely low-birthweight infants due to aggressive phototherapy, which is becoming an increasing problem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据