4.7 Article

Birth Weight and Intelligence in Young Adulthood and Midlife

期刊

PEDIATRICS
卷 139, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-3161

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [HD-17655, HD-20263]
  2. National Institute of Drug Abuse [9700093]
  3. Danish Research Council [1400/2-4-1997]
  4. Danish National Board of Health
  5. VELUX Foundation (VELUX) [26145, 31539]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: We examined the associations between birth weight and intelligence at 3 different adult ages. METHODS: The Copenhagen Perinatal Cohort is comprised of children born in Copenhagen from 1959 to 1961. Information on birth weight and >= 1 tests of intelligence was available for 4696 members of the cohort. Intelligence was assessed at a mean age of 19 years with the Borge Priens Prove test, at age 28 years with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, and at age 50 years with the lntelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R. RESULTS: Birth weight was significantly associated with intelligence at all 3 follow-up assessments, with intelligence scores increasing across 4 birth weight categories and declining for the highest birth weight category. The adjusted differences between those in the < 2.5kg birth weight group and those in the 3.5 to 4.00kg group were > 5 IQ points at all 3 follow-up assessments, corresponding to one-third of a SD. The association was stable from young adulthood into midlife,and not weaker at age 50 years. Adjustment for potential confounding factors, including infant socioeconomic status and gestational age, did not dilute the associations, and associations with intelligence were evident across the normal birth weight range and so were not accounted for by low birth weight only. CONCLUSIONS: The association between birth weight and intelligence is stable from young adulthood into midlife. These long-term cognitive consequences may imply that even small shifts in the distribution of birth size, in normal-sized infants as well, may have a large impact at the population level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据