4.2 Article

New Near-Infrared Fluorescent Probes with Single-Photon Anti-Stokes-Shift Fluorescence for Sensitive Determination of pH Variances in Lysosomes with a Double-Checked Capability

期刊

ACS APPLIED BIO MATERIALS
卷 1, 期 3, 页码 549-560

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.8b00020

关键词

near-infrared imaging; fluorescent probes; single-photon anti-Stokes-shift fluorescence; acidic pH in lysosome; theoretical computation

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [R15GM114751]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two near-infrared luminescent probes with Stokes-shift and single-photon anti-Stokes-shift fluorescence properties for sensitive determination of pH variance in lysosomes have been synthesized. A morpholine residue in probe A, which serves as a targeting group for lysosomes in viable cells, was attached to the fluorophores via a spirolactam moiety, while a mannose residue was ligated to probe B, resulting in an increased biocompatibility and solubility in water. Probes A and B contain closed spirolactam moieties, and show no Stokes-shift or anti-Stokes-shift fluorescence under neutral or alkali conditions. However, the probes incrementally react to pH variance from 7.22 to 2.76 with measurable increases in both Stokes-shift and anti-Stokes-shift fluorescence at 699 and 693 nm under 645 and 800 nm excitation, respectively. This acid-activated fluorescence is produced by the breaking of the probe spirolactam moiety, which greatly increased the overall p-conjugation in the probes. These probes possess upconversion near-infrared fluorescence imaging advantages including minimum cellular photo-damage, increased tissue penetration, and minimum biological fluorescence background. They display an excellent photostability with a low dye photobleaching and show a good biocompatibility. They are selective and capable of detecting pH variances in lysosomes at excitation with two different wavelengths, i.e., 645 and 800 nm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据