4.1 Article

The prognostic importance of TGF-, TGF- receptor, and fascin in childhood solid tumors

期刊

PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 238-253

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08880018.2017.1363838

关键词

Childhood cancers; fascin; prognosis; TGF-; TGF- receptor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fascin plays a role in tumor metastasis under the influence of TGF-, each potentiating the effect of the other. We retrospectively investigated whether there was a prognostic relationship between TGF- and fascin, and disease stage, local recurrence, metastasis tendency, and response to treatment. Twelve neuroblastomas, 17 osteosarcomas, 14 Ewing's sarcomas, 15 rhabdomyosarcoma cases, and 8 rare solid tumors were included. Serum TGF- levels were high at the time of diagnosis in all groups (p = .015) and decreased significantly during remission (p = .008). Serum TGF- values in the relapse period rarely reached high levels at the time of diagnosis and even stayed under the control group values (p = .017). When TGF- receptor expression in tumor tissues was evaluated, the association of TGF- receptor positivity with metastatic disease and advanced stage was striking. We found that 88% of rhabdomyosarcoma cases with alveolar histopathology expressed the TGF- receptor, and the association between TGF- receptor positivity and alveolar histopathology seemed to be a negative prognostic marker. When fascin levels were evaluated in childhood solid tumor tissue, the risk of relapse increased when the fascin total score at diagnosis was >4. This is one of the few studies including prognostic markers such as serum TGF-, tissue TGF-, TGF- receptor, and fascin in pediatric solid tumors. Considering the poor prognosis of advanced stage pediatric solid tumors and the need for biomarkers to predict which patient might need more intensive therapy or warrant closer follow-up afterward, we think that TGF-, TGF- receptor, and fascin expression have an important prognostic role.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据