4.7 Article

The Origin of the Heavy-element Content Trend in Giant Planets via Core Accretion

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 865, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad912

关键词

methods: analytical; planets and satellites: composition; planets and satellites: formation; planets and satellites: gaseous planets; protoplanetary disks

资金

  1. JPL/Caltech

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We explore the origin of the trend of heavy elements in observed massive exoplanets. Coupling of better measurements of the mass (M-p) and radius of exoplanets with planet structure models enables estimating the total heavy-element mass (M-Z) in these planets. The corresponding relation is characterized by a power-law profile, M-Z proportional to M-p(3/5). We develop a simplified but physically motivated analysis to investigate how the power-law profile can be produced under the current picture of planet formation. Making use of the existing semi-analytical formulae of accretion rates of pebbles and planetesimals, our analysis shows that the relation can be reproduced well if it traces the final stage of planet formation. In the stage, planets accrete solids from gapped planetesimal disks, and gas accretion is limited by disk evolution. We find that dust accretion accompanying gas accretion does not contribute to M-Z for planets with M-p < 10(3) M-circle plus. Our findings are broadly consistent with those of previous studies, yet we explicitly demonstrate how planetesimal dynamics is crucial for better understanding the relation. While our approach is simple, we can reproduce the trend of a correlation between planet metallicity and M-p that is obtained by detailed population synthesis calculations when the same assumption is adopted. Our analysis suggests that pebble accretion would not play a direct role at the final stage of planet formation, whereas radial drift of pebbles might be important indirectly for metal enrichment of planets. Detailed numerical simulations and more observational data are required for confirming our analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据