4.7 Review

Systematic review with meta-analysis: long-term outcomes of faecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridium difficile infection

期刊

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 43, 期 4, 页码 445-457

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apt.13492

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81320108024, 81421001, 81530072]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundClostridium difficile infection is a major cause of nosocomial diarrhoea. AimTo evaluate long-term (90 days) efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation for C. difficile infection and explore the factors affecting the faecal microbiota transplantation outcomes. MethodsMEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE were searched and only observational studies that utilised faecal microbiota transplantation for C. difficile infection with long-term follow-up duration (90 days) were included. Primary cure rate, overall recurrence rate and early (<90 days) and late (90 days) recurrence rate were calculated. ResultsEighteen observational studies with 611 patients were included. The primary cure rate was 91.2% (95% confidence interval, CI 86.7-94.8%). The overall recurrence rate was 5.5% (95% CI 2.2-10.3%). The early recurrence rate and late recurrence rate were 2.7% (95% CI 0.7-6.0%) and 1.7% (95% CI 0.4-4.2%) respectively. Most adverse events were expected, short-lived, self-limited and manageable. The association between faecal microbiota transplantation therapy and adverse events such as inflammatory bowel disease flare, infectious disease and autoimmune disease was a concern but remained insignificant. Old age (65 years) was identified as a risk factor for after faecal microbiota transplantation therapy. Upper gastrointestinal administration also results in less frequent primary cure. ConclusionsFaecal microbiota transplantation seems to be a highly effective and robust therapy for recurrent C. difficile infection. However, more quality studies, such as randomised controlled trials and cohort studies with control groups, are needed to confirm its long-term efficacy and safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据