4.5 Article

Trajectories of mental and physical functioning among spouse caregivers of cancer survivors over the first five years following the diagnosis

期刊

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
卷 100, 期 6, 页码 1213-1221

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.031

关键词

Cancer; Quality of life; Mental functioning; Physical health; Psychosocial oncology; Spouses

资金

  1. Cancer Council NSW
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council Research Fellowship [APP1012869]
  3. FRQS
  4. Cancer Institute New South Wales Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Identify the trajectories of physical and mental functioning among spouse caregivers of patients with cancer over the first five years post-diagnosis and variables associated with low or deteriorating functioning. Methods: Caregivers completed a survey at 6 months and 1, 2, 3.5, and 5 years post-patient diagnosis, including the SF-12 for quality of life (QOL). SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS, n = 299) and Physical Component Summary (PCS, n = 300) scores were analyzed using SAS. Results: Five trajectories for PCS were identified, the top three were: (a) high PCS (53.0%); (b) steady decline in PCS (17.0%); and (c) steady increase, but remaining below population norm (16.7%). Five trajectories for MCS were also identified, the top two being: (a) high MCS (45.8%) and (b) MCS comparable to population norm (27.8%). Variables associated with low or deteriorating QOL included depression, social support, coping, burden, and/or unmet needs. Conclusions: This is the first study to document spouse caregivers' QOL over the first five years post-patient diagnosis. Although many participants experienced high functioning, almost a third reported low or deteriorating mental or physical functioning. Practice implications: Variables associated with low or deteriorating mental and physical functioning can be targeted in future interventions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据