4.5 Article

The effectiveness of clinical pharmacist's intervention in improving asthma care in children and adolescents: Randomized controlled study in Jordan

期刊

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
卷 100, 期 4, 页码 728-735

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.11.002

关键词

Asthma; Asthma control; Pediatric patients; Clinical pharmacist intervention; Patient education; Quality of life

资金

  1. Deanship of Research at Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of clinical pharmacist's intervention on achieving better asthma control, quality of life and other clinical parameters. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study in north Jordan was conducted. Pediatric patients with asthma (aged 7-18 years old) were included and randomly allocated into two groups, intervention and control. Both groups were interviewed at the first visit and followed up twice by phone (at 3 and 6 months). Education was provided to patients and their caregivers in the intervention group only. Results: Of 206 eligible patients recruited and randomized to our study, 178 patients completed the study (48.3% intervention versus 51.7% control). There were no significant differences in all baseline data between both groups. We identified significant differences in the improvement of asthma control (p < 0.001) and consequently pediatric and caregiver quality of life (p < 0.001) between both groups at the end of study. Significant differences were also detected in other clinical parameters (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Implementation of clinical pharmacy service can positively influence asthma control, pediatric and caregiver's quality of life, and other clinical parameters. Practice implications: To maintain a good asthma status, education of pediatric patients and their caregivers should be part of routine assessment during clinic visit. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据