4.5 Article

Critical state shear behavior of the soil-structure interface determined by discrete element modeling

期刊

PARTICUOLOGY
卷 35, 期 -, 页码 68-77

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.partic.2017.02.002

关键词

Discrete element method; Interface; Direct shear test; Shear band; Dilatancy; Critical state

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB036304]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51308408, 11372228]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interface between soil and structure can be referred to as a soil-structure system, and its behavior plays an important role in many geotechnical engineering practices. In this study, results are presented from a series of monotonic direct shear tests performed on a sand-structure interface under constant normal stiffness using the discrete element method (DEM). Strain localization and dilatancy behavior of the interface is carefully examined at both macroscopic and microscopic scales. The effects of soil initial relative density and normal stress on the interface shear behavior are also investigated. The results show that a shear band progressively develops along the structural surface as shear displacement increases. At large shear displacement a unique relationship between stress ratio and void ratio is reached in the shear band for a certain normal stress, indicating that a critical state exists in the shear band. It is also found that the thickness and void ratio of the shear band at the critical state decreases with increasing normal stress. Comparison of the DEM simulation results with experimental results provides insight into the shear behavior of a sand-structure interface and offers a means for quantitative modeling of such interfaces based on the critical state soil mechanics. (C) 2017 Chinese Society of Particuology and Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据