3.8 Article

Research participation preferences as expressed through a patient portal: implications of demographic characteristics

期刊

JAMIA OPEN
卷 1, 期 2, 页码 202-209

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy034

关键词

research preferences; patient portal; research recruitment

资金

  1. NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) [UL1 TR001450]
  2. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) [U54MD010706]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: As patient portals are increasingly used for research recruitment, it is important to examine the demographic makeup of research registries that are populated via portals and the factors that influence participation in these registries. Methods: We examined the response to a routine research preference questionnaire among patients who were enrolled in a patient portal at an academic health center and characterized the sub-population that responded and was tracked in a research preferences registry. We examined the factors that influence choices in two research preferences: future contact for research opportunities and biobanking of de-identified specimens. Results: Out of 79 834 patients to whom the questionnaire was sent, 32% responded. Of those 74% agreed to future contact and 77% to the biobank preference. We found significantly lower odds of agreement in both preferences in minority populations, especially in the population >65 years of age when stratified by race. Individuals with higher comorbidity indexes had significantly higher odds for agreement. Discussion: The disparities in volunteerism as expressed by agreement to future contact and willingness to participate in biobanking are exacerbated by lower levels of enrollment in the patient portal by minorities, especially in the oldest age group. Future work should examine other socioeconomic factors and the differences across age groups, sicker individuals, and payer categories. Conclusion: Although patient portals can be more efficient for recruitment, researchers have to be cognizant of, and proactively address, potential biases when recruiting participants from these registries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据