4.6 Article

What Works in Youth Suicide Prevention? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

期刊

ECLINICALMEDICINE
卷 4-5, 期 -, 页码 52-91

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.10.004

关键词

Suicide prevention; Self-harm; Young people; Systematic review; Meta-analysis

资金

  1. Future Global Generations Fund
  2. William Buckland Foundation
  3. NHMRC Career Development Fellowship
  4. Auckland Medical Research Foundation Douglas Goodfellow Repatriation Fellowship
  5. Victorian Health andMedical Research Fellowship
  6. American Foundation for Suicide Prevention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Young people require specific attention when it comes to suicide prevention, however efforts need to be based on robust evidence. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies examining the impact of interventions that were specifically designed to reduce suicide-related behavior in young people. Findings: Ninety-nine studies were identified, of which 52 were conducted in clinical settings, 31 in educational or workplace settings, and 15 in community settings. Around half were randomized controlled trials. Large scale interventions delivered in both clinical and educational settings appear to reduce self-harmand suicidal ideation post-intervention, and to a lesser extent at follow-up. In community settings, multi-faceted, place-based approaches seem to have an impact. Study quality was limited. Interpretation: Overall whilst the number and range of studies is encouraging, gaps exist. Few studies were conducted in low-middle income countries or with demographic populations known to be at increased risk. Similarly, there was a lack of studies conducted in primary care, universities and workplaces. However, we identified that specific youth suicide-prevention interventions can reduce self-harm and suicidal ideation; these types of intervention need testing in high-quality studies. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据