4.6 Article

Unbiased Lipidomic Profiling of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Tissues Reveals the Association of Sphingomyelin Levels with Patient Disease-Free Survival

期刊

METABOLITES
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo8030041

关键词

lipidomics; sphingomyelin; sphingolipid; triple-negative breast cancer

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [U01CA179674-01A1, P30CA125123, R01CA220297]
  2. CPRIT grant [RP17005]
  3. American Cancer Society [127430-RSG-15-105-01-CNE]
  4. Brockman Foundation from the Alkek Center for Molecular Discovery
  5. Agilent Technologies Center for Excellence in Mass Spectrometry
  6. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  7. [P50CA186784]
  8. [P30 CA16056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The reprogramming of lipid metabolism is a hallmark of many cancers that has been shown to promote breast cancer progression. While several lipid signatures associated with breast cancer aggressiveness have been identified, a comprehensive lipidomic analysis specifically targeting the triple-negative subtype of breast cancer (TNBC) may be required to identify novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for this most aggressive subtype of breast cancer that still lacks effective therapies. In this current study, our global LC-MS-based lipidomics platform was able to measure 684 named lipids across 15 lipid classes in 70 TNBC tumors. Multivariate survival analysis found that higher levels of sphingomyelins were significantly associated with better disease-free survival in TNBC patients. Furthermore, analysis of publicly available gene expression datasets identified that decreased production of ceramides and increased accumulation of sphingoid base intermediates by metabolic enzymes were associated with better survival outcomes in TNBC patients. Our LC-MS lipidomics profiling of TNBC tumors has, for the first time, identified sphingomyelins as a potential prognostic marker and implicated enzymes involved in sphingolipid metabolism as candidate therapeutic targets that warrant further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据