4.7 Review

Online networks of racial hate: A systematic review of 10 years of research on cyber-racism

期刊

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR
卷 87, 期 -, 页码 75-86

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.026

关键词

Cyber-racism; White supremacy; Systematic review; Racism

资金

  1. Australian Research Council as part of the 'Cyber-racism and community resilience' project [LP120200319]
  2. Australian Human Rights Commission as part of the 'Cyber-racism and community resilience' project [LP120200319]
  3. Victorian Health Promotion Foundation as part of the 'Cyber-racism and community resilience' project [LP120200319]
  4. Australian Research Council [LP120200319] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ways in which the Internet can facilitate the expression and spread of racist views and ideologies have been the subject of a growing body of research across disciplines. To date, however, there has been no systematic reviews of this research. To synthesise current knowledge on the topic and identify directions for future research, we systematically review a decade of research on cyber-racism as perpetrated by groups and individuals (i.e., according to the source of cyber-racism). Overall, the cyber-racism research reviewed shows that racist groups and individuals use different communication channels, are driven by different goals, adopt different strategies, and the effects of their communication are distinctive. Despite these differences, both groups and individuals share a high level of skill and sophistication when expressing cyber-racism. Most of the studies reviewed relied on qualitative analyses of online textual data. Our review suggests there is a need for researchers to employ a broader array of methods, devote more attention to targets' perspectives, and extend their focus by exploring issues such as the roles of Internet in mobilising isolated racist individuals and in enabling ideological clustering of supporters of racist ideologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据