4.6 Article

Capabilities in business relationships and networks: Research recommendations and directions

期刊

INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 4-26

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.07.007

关键词

Research directions; Industrial marketing; Business relationships and networks; Dynamic capability theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Business relationships as well as the wider embedding network provide firms with crucial resources for their resource base, thus the capabilities that allow firms to successfully manage (in) such business relationships and networks have been an important research focus for industrial marketing. This article contends that there exist important opportunities for further knowledge generation with regard to capabilities in business relationships and networks, and our objective is to motivate and derive important research directions. The (already vast) literature is often not focused and requires rigor and direction in line with developments in research on (dynamic) capabilities in the strategy literature to remain impactful. Our aims are therefore: (i) To outline what the current state of knowledge is in the substantive literature relating to capabilities in business relationships and networks. Based on this we identify certain gaps that provide initial guidance regarding future research directions. (ii) To extensively review the current discussions regarding (dynamic) capability theory in the strategy literature. Based on this we derive recommendations from the foundational theory for research on capabilities in business relationships and networks. Bringing together the identified gaps in the substantive literature and the recommendations based on the developments in the foundational theory, we (iii) single out specific research directions in studying capabilities in business relationships and networks. We thereby contribute to the existing literature by providing a foundation for theory consensus creation as well as theory extension.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据