4.3 Review

Rise of Deep Learning for Genomic, Proteomic, and Metabolomic Data Integration in Precision Medicine

期刊

OMICS-A JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY
卷 22, 期 10, 页码 630-636

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/omi.2018.0097

关键词

precision medicine; deep learning; machine learning; artificial intelligence; multiomics data integration; biomarkers

资金

  1. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Duncan Family Institute for Cancer Prevention and Risk Assessment
  2. Chalermphrakiat Grant, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Machine learning (ML) is being ubiquitously incorporated into everyday products such as Internet search, email spam filters, product recommendations, image classification, and speech recognition. New approaches for highly integrated manufacturing and automation such as the Industry 4.0 and the Internet of things are also converging with ML methodologies. Many approaches incorporate complex artificial neural network architectures and are collectively referred to as deep learning (DL) applications. These methods have been shown capable of representing and learning predictable relationships in many diverse forms of data and hold promise for transforming the future of omics research and applications in precision medicine. Omics and electronic health record data pose considerable challenges for DL. This is due to many factors such as low signal to noise, analytical variance, and complex data integration requirements. However, DL models have already been shown capable of both improving the ease of data encoding and predictive model performance over alternative approaches. It may not be surprising that concepts encountered in DL share similarities with those observed in biological message relay systems such as gene, protein, and metabolite networks. This expert review examines the challenges and opportunities for DL at a systems and biological scale for a precision medicine readership.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据