4.2 Article

DECAY OF THE SEA ANEMONE METRIDIUM (ACTINIARIA): IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PRESERVATION OF CNIDARIAN POLYPS AND OTHER SOFT-BODIED DIPLOBLAST-GRADE ANIMALS

期刊

PALAIOS
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 388-395

出版社

SEPM-SOC SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY
DOI: 10.2110/palo.2016.102

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundations of Complex Life, an NSF Earth Sciences Postdoctoral Fellowship [NAI NNA13AA90A]
  2. NASA Exobiology [NNX14AJ86G]
  3. Directorate For Geosciences
  4. Division Of Earth Sciences [1452377] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fossils preserving the anatomy of soft tissues provide rare but essential evidence for the reconstruction of metazoan evolutionary history. Decay is inherent to the fossilization process and features may be distorted, displaced, or missing even in exceptionally preserved fossils, and non-anatomical artifacts may be introduced. Here we describe the results of experimental decay of the epibenthic actinian (sea anemone) Metridium senile and document serial changes in its morphology. Decay proceeded rapidly and followed a consistent, reproducible trajectory, which we divide into six stages; in the final stage, no anatomically illuminating information remained. The column, one of the most salient anatomical features of actinians, contracted near the time of death and changed shape dramatically thereafter. The tentacles decayed from their distal ends. Fibrous bundles representing the interior musculature were among the morphological features most resistant to degradation, and taphonomically induced transverse bands were also long lasting. These experimental results provide a semi-quantitative and predictive framework which can be applied to the interpretation of putative polypoid cnidarian organisms. Furthermore, this decay series shows that diploblast-and triploblast-grade fossils are unlikely to be confused and provides the means to evaluate the taxonomic validity of the long-standing assumption that many enigmatic soft-bodied Ediacaran and lower Cambrian taxa are of actinian grade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据