4.7 Article

Ocean Solutions to Address Climate Change and Its Effects on Marine Ecosystems

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00337

关键词

climate change; ocean acidification; ocean solutions; global; local; governance

资金

  1. Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation
  2. Ocean Acidification International Coordination Centre of the International Atomic Energy Agency
  3. Veolia Foundation
  4. French Facility for Global Environment
  5. French Government under the Investissements d'avenir programme [ANR-10-LABX-14-01]
  6. RESCCUE project - French Development Agency
  7. French Global Environment Facility [AFD CZZ 2205 01 W, FFEM CZZ 1667 01 H]
  8. Nippon Foundation-UBC Nereus Program
  9. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST)
  10. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [642018]
  11. grant SEASCAPE from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) as part of the Special Priority Program [(SPP)-1889]
  12. Nature Conservancy
  13. International Climate Initiative (IKI) - German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety
  14. US NSF [DEB-1212124, OCE-1736830]
  15. Netherlands Earth System Science Center
  16. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [642018] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Paris Agreement target of limiting global surface warming to 1.5-2 degrees C compared to pre-industrial levels by 2100 will still heavily impact the ocean. While ambitious mitigation and adaptation are both needed, the ocean provides major opportunities for action to reduce climate change globally and its impacts on vital ecosystems and ecosystem services. A comprehensive and systematic assessment of 13 global- and local-scale, ocean-based measures was performed to help steer the development and implementation of technologies and actions toward a sustainable outcome. We show that (1) all measures have tradeoffs and multiple criteria must be used for a comprehensive assessment of their potential, (2) greatest benefit is derived by combining global and local solutions, some of which could be implemented or scaled-up immediately, (3) some measures are too uncertain to be recommended yet, (4) political consistency must be achieved through effective cross-scale governance mechanisms, (5) scientific effort must focus on effectiveness, co-benefits, disbenefits, and costs of poorly tested as well as new and emerging measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据