4.6 Article

Tumor necrosis factor alpha secreted from oral squamous cell carcinoma contributes to cancer pain and associated inflammation

期刊

PAIN
卷 158, 期 12, 页码 2396-2409

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001044

关键词

Cancer pain; Inflammation; Tumor necrosis factor alpha; Oral squamous cell carcinoma

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA016087] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01 DE025393, R01 DE019796] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients with oral cancer report severe pain during function. Inflammation plays a role in the oral cancer microenvironment; however, the role of immune cells and associated secretion of inflammatory mediators in oral cancer pain has not been well defined. In this study, we used 2 oral cancer mouse models: a cell line supernatant injection model and the 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4NQO) chemical carcinogenesis model. We used the 2 models to study changes in immune cell infiltrate and orofacial nociception associated with oral squamous cell carcinoma (oSCC). Oral cancer cell line supernatant inoculation and 4NQO-induced oSCC resulted in functional allodynia and neuronal sensitization of trigeminal tongue afferent neurons. Although the infiltration of immune cells is a prominent component of both oral cancer models, our use of immune-deficient mice demonstrated that oral cancer-induced nociception was not dependent on the inflammatory component. Furthermore, the inflammatory cytokine, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha), was identified in high concentration in oral cancer cell line supernatant and in the tongue tissue of 4NQO-treated mice with oSCC. Inhibition of TNF alpha signaling abolished oral cancer cell line supernatant-evoked functional allodynia and disrupted T-cell infiltration. With these data, we identified TNF alpha as a prominent mediator in oral cancer-induced nociception and inflammation, highlighting the need for further investigation in neural-immune communication in cancer pain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据