4.7 Article

Authenticating the Presence of a Relativistic Massive Black Hole Binary in OJ 287 Using Its General Relativity Centenary Flare: Improved Orbital Parameters

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 866, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadd95

关键词

black hole physics; gravitation; quasars: general; quasars: individual (OJ 287)

资金

  1. NCN [2012/04/A/ST9/00083, 2018/09/B/ST9/02004]
  2. GACR [13-33324S]
  3. Academy of Finland [274931]
  4. Christopher R. Redlich Fund
  5. TABASGO Foundation
  6. Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science (UC Berkeley)
  7. National Science Foundation (NSF) [PHY-1607611]
  8. STFC [ST/L00061X/1, PP/E001149/1, ST/H002391/1, ST/J001465/1, ST/R000484/1, ST/F007159/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Academy of Finland (AKA) [274931, 274931] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Results from regular monitoring of relativistic compact binaries like PSR 1913+16 are consistent with the dominant (quadrupole) order emission of gravitational waves (GWs). We show that observations associated with the binary black hole (BBH) central engine of blazar OJ 287 demand the inclusion of gravitational radiation reaction effects beyond the quadrupolar order. It turns out that even the effects of certain hereditary contributions to GW emission are required to predict impact flare timings of OJ 287. We develop an approach that incorporates this effect into the BBH model for OJ 287. This allows us to demonstrate an excellent agreement between the observed impact flare timings and those predicted from ten orbital cycles of the BBH central engine model. The deduced rate of orbital period decay is nine orders of magnitude higher than the observed rate in PSR 1913+16, demonstrating again the relativistic nature of OJ 287's central engine. Finally, we argue that precise timing of the predicted 2019 impact flare should allow a test of the celebrated black hole no-hair theorem at the 10% level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据