4.3 Article

Migration Testing of Polyethylene Terephthalate: Comparison of Regulated Test Conditions with Migration into Real Food at the End of Shelf Life

期刊

PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE
卷 31, 期 12, 页码 771-780

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pts.2291

关键词

migration test; modelling; polyethylene terephthalate; packaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in contact with food must comply with the requirements laid down in the European Regulation (EU) 10/2011, which specifies conditions for migration tests. For real contact times longer than 30 days, accelerated migration tests are performed at elevated temperatures for a maximum of 10 days at 60 degrees C. These conditions should represent the end of the shelf life (e.g. 365 days at 23 degrees C) and are calculated using the Arrhenius equation on the basis of a default activation energy of 80 kJ/mol. However, for PET, it is well known that the activation energy is strongly dependent on the molecular size of the migrant. Small molecules like acetaldehyde have activation energies in PET of similar to 80 kJ/mol. For larger molecules like 2-aminobenzamide with a predicted activation energy of diffusion of 134.4 kJ/mol, the storage times at 60 degrees C and 40 degrees C equivalent to the migration after 1 year at 23 degrees C are 0.85 and 18.9 days, respectively. These findings were confirmed by experimental migration tests. For 2-aminobenzamide, migration for 10 days at 60 degrees C corresponded to a storage time at 23 degrees C of 11.7 years, which is significantly higher than the long-term storage of more than 6 months as foreseen in Regulation (EU) 10/2011. For larger molecules, the corresponding storage times at 23 degrees C would even be longer, thus overestimating by far the migration at the end of shelf life. Contact conditions of 10 days at 60 degrees C are too severe for PET. Migrant-specific and polymer-specific diffusion parameters should therefore be considered when designing accelerated migration tests for long-term applications. Copyright (C) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据