4.1 Article

ADENOVIRUSES OF THE MOST ANCIENT PRIMATE LINEAGES SUPPORT THE THEORY ON VIRUS-HOST CO-EVOLUTION

期刊

ACTA VETERINARIA HUNGARICA
卷 66, 期 3, 页码 474-487

出版社

AKADEMIAI KIADO ZRT
DOI: 10.1556/004.2018.042

关键词

Prosimian adenovirus; New World monkey adenovirus; virus-host co-evolution; phylogenetic analysis; wild prosimian

资金

  1. Hungarian Scientific Research Fund Grant OTKA [NN107632]
  2. EU [FP7-290002, FP7-324325]
  3. NWO/ALW
  4. Hungarian Balassi Institute (Tempus Public Foundation)
  5. KNAW Academy Ecology Fund
  6. Dr. J. L. Dobberke Foundation
  7. Treub Foundation
  8. FONA Foundation for Research on Nature Conservation
  9. Dutch Royal Botanical Society
  10. Dutch Royal Zoological Society
  11. PERC grant [1208, 5120873001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The scarcity or complete lack of information on the adenoviruses (AdVs) occurring in the most ancient non-human primates resulted in the initiation of a study for exploring their abundance and diversity in prosimians and New World monkeys (NWMs). In order to assess the variability of these AdVs and the possible signs of the hypothesised virus-host co-evolution, samples from almost every family of NWMs and prosimians were screened for the presence of AdVs. A PCR-screening of 171 faecal or organ samples from live or dead, captive or wild-living prosimians and NWMs was performed. The PCR products from the gene of the IVa2 protein were sequenced and used in phylogeny calculations. The presence of 10 and 15 new AdVs in seven and ten different species of prosimians and NWMs was revealed, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the tentative novel AdVs cluster into two separate groups, which form the most basal branches among the primate AdVs, and therefore support the theory on the co-evolution of primate AdVs with their hosts. This is the first report that provides a comprehensive overview of the AdVs occurring in prosimians and NWMs, and the first insight into the evolutionary relationships among AdVs from all major primate groups.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据