3.8 Article

TOWARDS FOOD SECURITY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT THROUGH ENHANCING EFFICIENCY OF GRAIN INDUSTRY

期刊

出版社

ENTERPRENEURSHIP & SUSTAINABILITY CENTER
DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1(27)

关键词

food security; sustainable development; interindustry interaction; grain products' sub-complex; grain market; state regulation; economic relations; innovations; grain storage; methods; methodology; tools; mechanism; The Republic of Kazakhstan

类别

资金

  1. project Inter-sectoral economic interaction of enterprises (organizations) of the grain products sub-complex in the conditions of the contemporary agro-industrial policy - Ministry of Education and Science of The Republic of Kazakhstan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The new situation of Kazakhstan's participation in the world grain market, which requires scientific generalization, is connected with the transformation of the country's trade turnover from interregional to interstate. In this connection, it is objectively necessary to scientifically and methodically substantiate the system of inter-branch cooperation between enterprises for the production and sale of grain and grain processing products in order to ensure stable provision of demand for them in the regions of the country with minimum costs and export it to foreign markets. The problem of increasing the efficiency of the use of grain requires a comprehensive reduction in its consumption across all consumption channels: on seeds, when processed into flour and cereals, for forage purposes. The paramount importance of effective inter-industry cooperation between grain sub-sector organizations is determined by the leading role of grain in the economy of the agro-industrial complex, food security, and the formation of state, interstate and interregional economic ties of the country. In the current situation, the stable functioning of the grain market should be carried out on the basis of a combination of market mechanisms with state regulation tools and targeted support of its subjects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据